|
|
LETTER TO EDITOR |
|
Year : 2015 | Volume
: 2
| Issue : 2 | Page : 49-51 |
|
A case of benign lichenoid keratosis
Amita Mhatre, Nitin Nadkarni, Sharmila Patil, Shweta Agarwal
Department of Dermatology, DY Patil University School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Date of Web Publication | 6-Jan-2016 |
Correspondence Address: Amita Mhatre Department of Dermatology, DY Patil University School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/2349-6029.173419
How to cite this article: Mhatre A, Nadkarni N, Patil S, Agarwal S. A case of benign lichenoid keratosis. Indian J Dermatopathol Diagn Dermatol 2015;2:49-51 |
How to cite this URL: Mhatre A, Nadkarni N, Patil S, Agarwal S. A case of benign lichenoid keratosis. Indian J Dermatopathol Diagn Dermatol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 22];2:49-51. Available from: https://www.ijdpdd.com/text.asp?2015/2/2/49/173419 |
Sir,
Benign lichenoid keratosis (BLK) is a dermatologic lesion of unknown etiology that is often confused with benign cutaneous neoplasm. BLK may represent lymphocyte-mediated regression of preexisting lentigo or reticulated seborrheic keratosis. Histologically, it may show findings of lichen planus (LP). The diagnosis of this benign lesion is made by a combination of clinical features, dermatoscopy, and dermatopathology; an awareness of its presentation is therefore, necessary.
Here, we report a case of a solitary lesion on the chest, the findings of which were clinically and histologically consistent with BLK.
A 78-year-old man of skin type 2 presented with a single asymptomatic, persistent, raised lesion on the right side of the chest since the past 2 months. He had not received any treatment for this previously.
A solitary well-defined violaceous, nontender plaque of 3 cm×4 cm size was present over the infraclavicular area [Figure 1]. It was not associated with any erosion or ulceration. The rest of the physical examination was normal.
Differential diagnosis of actinic keratosis, benign lichenoid keratosis, Bowen's disease, and LP was considered.
Dermatoscopy showed a reticulated pattern of bluish gray papules and lines on a background of mild erythema suggestive of BLK [Figure 2]. These were different from the dermatoscopic findings of LP that includes Wickham striae. | Figure 2: Reticulated pattern of blue-gray dots and lines seen on dermatoscopy
Click here to view |
Skin biopsy showed hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, acanthosis, and a band-like lymphocytic infiltrate at the dermoepidermal junction with multiple colloid bodies [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]. | Figure 3: Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) stained section under 4× objective showing elongated rete ridges and band like infiltrate at the dermoepidermal junction
Click here to view |
 | Figure 4: H and E staining under 10× objective shows acanthosis, lymphocytic infiltrate at dermoepidermal junction and colloid bodies
Click here to view |
 | Figure 5: H and E staining under 40× objective shows multiple colloid or civatte bodies
Click here to view |
Other investigations were within normal limits.
The patient responded to topical 5% fluorouracil applied once a day for 2 weeks and showed a near-complete resolution [Figure 6].
Shapiro and Ackerman in 1966 described BLK as a clinicohistological entity. [1] Lumpkin and Helwig [2] called it "forme fruste" of LP.
Sonthalia et al. has reported a case of BLK from India in 2014. [3] To our knowledge, ours is the second case of BLK reported from India.
Clinically, BLK presents as a solitary lesion on sun-exposed sitessuch as the trunk, upper extremities, and face. It is common in fair-skinned women, between the 5 th and 7 th decade. It manifests as a rapidly evolving, mildly pruritic papule or indurated plaque of about 5-20 mm in diameter, with smooth or verrucous surface and brown or erythematous to violaceous color.
Panizzon and Skaria have described three morphologic variants of BLK: The erythematous type, papulokeratotic type, and plaque type. [4]
Histopathologically, the difference between LP and BLK is subtle. Many epidermal and dermal findings of BLK are also seen in LP. However, the presence of parakeratosis, spongiosis, and exocytosis of lymphoid cells are more common in BLK. The dermal infiltrate may show plasma cells. Morgan and Stevens have described five histopathological variants of BLK. These include the classic type that are consistent with the findings seen in our case, the atypical form with few atypical lymphocytes within the lichenoid infiltrate, bullous form, interface form, and the atrophic form. [5]
Dermatoscopic findings include diffuse and localized granular pattern consisting of multiple blue-gray dots with uniform pigmented areas. According to Zaballos et al., BLK usually shows a localized and diffuse granular pattern where the granules are coarse and exhibit different shades of gray. [6]
Most cases of BLK regress spontaneously. Topical steroids may produce resolution of the lesion. Surgical excision may be helpful. Our review of the literature showed no specific recommendation of treatment. In our case, the patient declined surgery and was offered topical 5-fluorouracil that produced good results.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Shapiro L, Ackerman AB. Solitary lichen planus-like keratosis. Dermatologica 1966;132:386-92. |
2. | Lumpkin LR, Helwig EB. Solitary lichen planus. Arch Dermatol 1966;93:54-5. |
3. | Sonathalia S, Khetan P, Sarkar R, Sharma S, Arora R. Solitary violaceous plaque over the abdomen. Indian J Dermatol 2015; 60:108. |
4. | Panizzon R, Skaria A. Solitary lichenoid benign keratosis: Aclinicopathological investigation and comparison to lichen planus. Dermatologica 1990;181:284-8. |
5. | Morgan MB, Stevens GL, Switlyk S. Benign lichenoid keratosis: A clinical and pathologic reappraisal of 1040 cases. Am J Dermatopathol 2005;27:387-92. |
6. | Zaballos P, Martì E, Cuéllar F, Puig S, Malvehy J. Dermoscopy of lichenoid regressing seborrheic keratosis. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142:410. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
|